Sunday, December 25, 2005

The Culture label

There has always been too little real respect for freedom in India, I feel. While that may sound like a too-broad generalisation, it isn’t. Its something I’ve observed at too many levels – at home, at work, in the daily interaction with so many different people. As a society, we seem to value order and familiarity more, which we then label under the comforting title 'culture'. Then we hold on to it with both hands, even if that means choking the life out of individual spaces and desires. .

When I was in college and staying at a paying guest house, there was a young girl who came to stay, one evening. Another student, but somehow she seemed younger, more naïve. Not yet eighteen, and married already, with a fake birth certificate produced triumphantly to get the registrar to agree. Straight out of a bollywood pot-boiler, she was actually on the run from her family, having dared to commit that crime, marry someone from another religion. Three months down the line, when I had moved away, I heard that she had killed herself unable to bear the pressure anymore. An overdose of pills, death down your gullet so smoothly. This girl came across as someone exceptionally child-like, and with little maturity to carry off a long-term relationship. Still, I could only wonder, what kind of parents did she have, who thought it was okay to lock her up in her room and beat her, which was what had made her run away in the first place.

There seems to be something wrong with a culture which places so little emphasis on the rights of young people, simply because of a veneration for age. In these days ofcourse, even saying something like this is dicey – immediately, one will be branded that lowest of all things criminal – a destroyer of Indian or Tamizh or whatever culture the protestors feel like safeguarding at the moment. But I don’t believe that belonging to any nationality or state places any obligation on me to defend its excesses. Surely the first sign of rationality or enlightenment is the ability to question. But that is not something we encourage.

In school, while planning for an excursion, a new student dared to ask our class teacher how the money being collected for the trip was being allocated. The student was simply pulled up for his impertinence, possibly to cover up deficiencies in the way the money was really being spent. The attitude was, we are teachers and we know what’s right, you will be told stuff strictly on a need-to-know basis, and again, we decide what you need to know. (Substitute teachers with parents or elders or government servants or people with more money or any such thing which confers status and power and you have more or less the same scenario). We start out at school, from our earliest days, being asked to just obey, be good children, not talk too much, learn by-heart. Very soon, if there are people still asking questions, its inspite of the system, not because of it. Not only does this system encourage us to obey, it teaches us to feel guilty even if we think of disobeying.

I am writing this, simply because all these so-called defenders of morality rising up suddenly, gives me the shivers. I am scared to be living in a country where people still hold unquestioningly that a woman’s chastity is her greatest virtue. I am petrified of living in a country where some people still think that a girl and a boy need to be ‘permitted’ to sit in a park peacefully. We are not questioning it enough, the credentials and motives of these self-styled defenders of the faith. Or atleast, there are not enough questions coming up from the people who matter. If the Tamizh industry at large had spoken up in defence of Khushboo, I doubt there would have been sufficient time and energy to build and burn effigies of each and every actor. Atleast this incident in Meerut got politicians of all hues, including Sushma Swaraj talking.

I think its time we started looking inwards and admit that just because we are Indian, our culture is not necessarily ideal in every aspect. We need to be open to change, and not view ourselves as keepers of some kind of sacred fire that will go out if we don’t keep fanning it every minute. Culture is dynamic and going to move in many different ways, irrespective of whether certain individuals see it that way. Saare jahan se accha and all that is fine, but lets not go overboard and take it too literally!

8 comments:

Srihari said...

Aparna, I would'nt entirely agree that safeguarding our 'culture' is wrong and that we do not give due respect for freedom, in particular,freedom to our youth. I agree that excesses (imagine excessive freedom as opposed to excessive restrictions - an analogy would be cars on a highway) are definitely not ideal, but who's to say what the balance is?

I, personally, think today's youth learn too much too soon. Blame the IDIOT BOX, if you will. So I wouldnt really fault our culture's "it's better to be safe than sorry" approach.

Talking of 'culture', while it is surely dynamic, I think resistance to change is universal, natural and beneficial. Ask Alvin Toffler! I think questioning the pros and cons of an external culture is very reasonable, since aping other cultures blindly will be a folly. What works in the West might not necessarily work best in the East.

apu said...

Its not really so much about "our culture" versus theirs, and which is better. What I am against is the blind obedience to habits which is then conveniently classified as culture.

Again, when you say *youth*, in our society, what is really youth? A 25 year old is not really *allowed* to, for example, choose a person to get married to, in many cases. Would you call such a person a *youth*? We seem to conveniently classify as young anyone who is single...

alchemist said...

what is our culture anyway? anything and everything to protect and preserve and keep in line the huge mass of middle class. thats about it. the classes above and below are exempt from culture.
besides our culture is just a facade - and exists to keep up the pretence.
as for chastity and virtue - they became our culture when our nation was repeatedly invaded by marauding tribes (in most cases muslim)....
i think our culture has long decayed and rotten - we are just begining ot get the smell of rot!

alchemist said...

and accept it or not - the flow of information will only get faster and the quantum will also increase. and when u talk of aping another culture - what culture are we talking about here? there are no cultures that the youth can see anywhere.... and there is no such thing as a western culture either... even though you could put indian culture under one subhead...

Srihari said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Srihari said...

That's quite true - the Indian middle class has borne the collective burden of our culture.

When I say aping other cultures, I broadly speak of practices that would not be characteristic of an Indian society. We need to thresh the external influence in order to separate the wheat from the chaff, if you will.

I wouldn't think our culture has decayed, it has not lost its identity over the ages of marauders, and colonists. It has certainly evolved but my point is that if we accept the way of living that we see elsewhere in the world, it may not work out at all.

Habits in dating, eating, mating, family structures, dressing...they are greatly influenced by what we see elsewhere (read: 'the West', today we are not hip if we wear turbans and purdahs, are we?). It works here too, not always.

Apu, dont you think the mix-up between being single, and being called a 'youth' is not too unreasonable. For ages, parents in our culture have had to 'get their children married', and so were not really on our own until we got married ! Somehow, people in our age group dont think of how our culture gives us a firm family foundation through childhood, that other cultures dont always give. Its only when we grow up to value our freedom so much do we make a noise about it.
Growing up is like imbibing discipline - almost like a scaffolding - in that we think it constrains us, but in the end it liberates us. Freedom, I believe, is best learnt through obedience.

apu said...

"Freedom, I believe, is best learnt through obedience. "

Scary thought!

Seriously, I don't believe in this "We". Who is to say that "all of us" need to follow this culture? As an individual, what if I say that I don't want this culture...Beyond the argument of which culture is better for me, as an individual I am still entitled to reject or question something...

So I still stand by my original argument...which is - not whether another culture is better for me - but - whether I as an individual can choose...

Anonymous said...

Wonderful and informative web site. I used information from that site its great. Village ford